Clinical practices in the escalation of care for the deteriorating patient: a multicentre study
1
Department of Intensive Care, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, Netherlands
2
Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
3
Department of Acute Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
4
Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
5
Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
6
Department of Intensive Care, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
7
Department of Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
8
Department of Intensive Care, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
9
Department of Intensive Care, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Netherlands
10
Department of Intensive Care, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
11
Department of Intensive Care, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands
12
Department of Intensive Care, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Rapid response systems (RRSs) have been introduced to assist in the effective management of deteriorating patients. Optimal system performance requires adequate staffing levels and compliance with the escalation protocol. Delay and failures in activation of the rapid response team (RRT) are directly correlated to adverse outcomes. The current study analyses clinical practice and adherence to the RRS protocol in the Netherlands in correlation with demographic data from the hospitals. Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional survey using a vignette-based questionnaire was employed. Healthcare providers on the included medical and surgical wards participated. A descriptive analysis was performed on the data from the questionnaires and correlated to RRT activations and nurse-to-patient ratios. Results: The response rate was 31% (n=654). During the day shift, a ratio of 5-8:1 (patient-to-nurse) was reported in 52-60% of the hospitals. During evening shifts, 20-34% reported ratios of more than 8:1, and overnight, at least 84% reported even higher ratios. More than 50% of nurses perceived their workload to be ‘fairly heavy’. In contrast, 55-66% of the registrars perceived their workload to be ‘fairly heavy’ whereas consultants deemed work to be balanced. Upon detection of a deteriorating patient, nurses called the doctor in 88-90% of cases. The RTT was activated in 90% of cases. Conclusion: Compliance with RRS processes is reported to be high. Nurses reported significant workloads and high patient-to-nurse ratios. These ratios are likely to affect the ability to escalate care and provide optimal management for the deteriorating patient. © 2021, Netherlands Society of Intensive Care. All rights reserved.
License
Copyright (c) Netharland Journal of Critical Care
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
Neth. J. Crit. Care open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.