Netharland Journal of Critical Care
2010,
Volume 14,
Issue 2
: 92-97
Review
Should we use feeding guidelines in the ICU? a review of the evidence
Abstract
Objective: The appropriate and timely provision of nutritional support to the critically ill hospitalized patient is recognized as an important quality benchmark. However, daily practice is not consistent with best evidence practice. The purpose of this review was to identify and appraise the available evidence to determine whether guidelines for nutritional support can bridge the gap between best evidence and actual practice in the intensive care unit (ICU). Search strategy: Medline (www.PubMed) was searched to detect cluster randomized controlled trials evaluating the benefits of implementing a clinical practice guideline for nutritional support in the ICU. Reference lists of retrieved articles were hand searched. Summary of findings: Three hundred and seventy-six potentially eligible studies were reviewed. Three multi-centre cluster randomized trials were identified. In two of these trials, significant practice change was achieved in the ICU through the active implementation of a clinical practice guideline. In one trial, these improvements in practice translated to a significant reduction in mortality and hospital length of stay. No harm was documented. Conclusions: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines may be used as a vehicle to change practice and improve patient outcomes in the intensive care unit. Use of a multifaceted practice change strategy, composed of as many specific change interventions as practicable, may be required to overcome ICU-specific barriers to change. © 2010, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Intensive Care. All Rights Reserved.
Keywords
Critical care
Critically ill
Guidelines
Intensive care
Nutrition
Review
License
Copyright (c) Netharland Journal of Critical Care
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
Neth. J. Crit. Care open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Recommended Articles
Right ventricular failure: Is it relevant for the intensivist?
Neuropsychological Predictors of Violent Criminal Behavior
Raymond H. Ellis,
Shruti Banerjee,
Kazuo Takayama
1-6
Postoperative renal replacement therapy after hydroxyethyl starch infusion: A meta-analysis of randomised trials
Wilkes M.M.,
Navickis R.J.
4-9
Pocus series: Focused transoesophageal echocardiography, a view from the inside
Elzo Kraemer C.V.,
López Matta J.E.,
Friedericy H.J.,
Elzo Kraemer A.X.,
Tuinman P.R.,
van Westerloo D.J.,
Boogers J.M.J.
130-139