Netharland Journal of Critical Care
2009,
Volume 13,
Issue 2
: 79-83
Review
What is the best prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in the critically ill?
1
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract
The question 'What is the best prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in the critically ill?' is clinically relevant. The answer is formulated based upon the best available evidence with a focus on pharmacological prophylaxis and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Four randomized controlled clinical trials with a grade I level of evidence are discussed in detail. Unfractionated heparin is the best studied pharmacological prophylaxis in addition to enoxaparin and nadroparin. The endpoints in these studies all concerned deep venous thrombosis detected by imaging techniques and unrelated to symptoms. The clinical relevance of these endpoints is debatable. No firm conclusions can be drawn on the efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin and nadroparin in the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in the critically ill. As a consequence, no true recommendations can be given for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in these patients. Copyright © 2009, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Intensive Care. All Rights Reserved.
Keywords
Critically ill
Deep venous thrombosis
Prevention
Prophylaxis
Pulmonary embolism
Venous thromboembolism
License
Copyright (c) Netharland Journal of Critical Care
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
Neth. J. Crit. Care open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Recommended Articles
Right ventricular failure: Is it relevant for the intensivist?
Neuropsychological Predictors of Violent Criminal Behavior
Raymond H. Ellis,
Shruti Banerjee,
Kazuo Takayama
1-6
Postoperative renal replacement therapy after hydroxyethyl starch infusion: A meta-analysis of randomised trials
Wilkes M.M.,
Navickis R.J.
4-9
Pocus series: Focused transoesophageal echocardiography, a view from the inside
Elzo Kraemer C.V.,
López Matta J.E.,
Friedericy H.J.,
Elzo Kraemer A.X.,
Tuinman P.R.,
van Westerloo D.J.,
Boogers J.M.J.
130-139